Guava Leaf Extract: A Promising Alternative to Chlorhexidine for Reducing Streptococcus mutans Colonization on Orthodontic Appliances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i4.1252Keywords:
Antimicrobial activity, Chlorhexidine, Guava leaf extract, Orthodontic appliances, Streptococcus mutansAbstract
Background: Streptococcus mutans is a major contributor to the formation of dental plaque and the initiation of caries. Orthodontic appliances, particularly removable ones, can create favorable conditions for S. mutans colonization, increasing the risk of caries and other oral health issues. Chlorhexidine is a commonly used antimicrobial agent in dentistry, but it can have side effects like tooth staining and altered taste. Guava leaf extract has shown promising antibacterial properties due to its rich content of flavonoids, tannins, and other bioactive compounds. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of guava leaf extract and chlorhexidine in reducing S. mutans colonization on acrylic-based removable orthodontic appliances.
Methods: This in vitro study used 25 acrylic plates, which were divided into five groups: guava leaf extract at concentrations of 75%, 80%, and 90%, chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% (positive control), and aquades (negative control). The acrylic plates were first contaminated with S. mutans and then immersed in the respective solutions for 10 minutes. The number of S. mutans colonies was then counted using a colony counter.
Results: The mean number of S. mutans colonies was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group (27.8 ± 6.6 CFU/ml) and the guava leaf extract groups (9.4 ± 3.3 CFU/ml for 90%, 42 ± 7.8 CFU/ml for 80%, and 381 ± 81.1 CFU/ml for 75%) compared to the aquades group (1461.2 ± 274.5 CFU/ml). There was no significant difference between the chlorhexidine group and the 90% and 80% guava leaf extract groups.
Conclusion: Guava leaf extract, particularly at concentrations of 90% and 80%, is as effective as chlorhexidine in reducing S. mutans colonization on orthodontic appliances. Guava leaf extract may be a promising natural alternative to chlorhexidine for maintaining oral hygiene in orthodontic patients, especially those with concerns about chlorhexidine's side effects.
Authors
- Davin1*
- Firdha Muharraran2
- Weni Selvina3
- 1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
- 2Department of Dental Science, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
- 3Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
Corresponding author Davin — davinlim22@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.
