Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The management of refractory cancer pain represents a formidable clinical challenge at the intersection of oncology and palliative medicine. When patients with advanced malignancy fail to achieve adequate analgesia or develop intolerable adverse effects from their opioid regimen, clinicians are faced with a crucial decision: to escalate the dose of the current opioid (dose titration) or to switch to a different opioid agent (opioid rotation). The optimal strategy remains a subject of intense debate and variable practice. This meta-analysis was conducted to rigorously compare the efficacy and safety of these two common interventions.
Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2015 and December 2024. We included studies that directly compared opioid rotation with dose titration in adult palliative care patients diagnosed with refractory cancer pain. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in pain intensity, analyzed using the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) to accommodate pain scales such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Primary safety outcomes were the incidence of severe neurotoxicity and severe constipation. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as SMD for the continuous pain outcome and Risk Ratio (RR) for dichotomous adverse events, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Seven RCTs, encompassing a total of 962 patients, met the stringent inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that the strategy of opioid rotation resulted in a statistically significant and clinically substantial greater reduction in pain intensity compared to continued dose titration (SMD -0.65, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.42], p<0.00001; I²=81%). Furthermore, the risk of developing severe neurotoxicity, including delirium and myoclonus, was significantly lower in the rotation group (RR 0.62, 95% CI [0.45, 0.85], p=0.003; I²=18%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe constipation between the two intervention groups (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.71, 1.14], p=0.38; I²=24%).
Conclusion: In patients with refractory cancer pain, the strategy of opioid rotation provided superior analgesia and was associated with a markedly lower risk of severe neurotoxicity when compared to the continued dose titration of the same opioid. These findings provide strong, high-level evidence to support the use of opioid rotation as a primary and proactive strategy for managing uncontrolled pain or dose-limiting side effects in the palliative care population.
Keywords
Article Details
As our aim is to disseminate original research article, hence the publishing right is a necessary one. The publishing right is needed in order to reach the agreement between the author and publisher. As the journal is fully open access, the authors will sign an exclusive license agreement.
The authors have the right to:
- Share their article in the same ways permitted to third parties under the relevant user license.
- Retain copyright, patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights including research data.
- Proper attribution and credit for the published work.
For the open access article, the publisher is granted to the following right.
- The non-exclusive right to publish the article and grant right to others.
- For the published article, the publisher applied for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
