Redefining the Therapeutic Ladder in Refractory Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) Inhibitors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i9.1381Keywords:
Chronic constipation, Elobixibat, IBAT inhibitors, Ileal bile acid transporter, RefractoryAbstract
Background: Chronic constipation (CC) refractory to conventional laxatives is a prevalent clinical challenge that significantly impairs quality of life. Ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors, a novel class of drugs, modulate colonic function by increasing the delivery of bile acids to the colon. This study aimed to quantitatively synthesize the evidence for the efficacy and safety of IBAT inhibitors in this difficult-to-treat population to clarify their position in the therapeutic algorithm.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, along with clinical trial registries, from inception to June 1st, 2025. We included parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the IBAT inhibitor elobixibat with placebo in adults with CC refractory to at least two prior laxative classes. The primary efficacy outcome was the overall responder rate. Key secondary outcomes included change in spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week, quality of life (QoL) scores, and incidence of adverse events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Number needed to treat (NNT) and to harm (NNH) were calculated.
Results: Our search identified six eligible RCTs enrolling 2,155 patients. Patients treated with elobixibat were significantly more likely to be responders compared to placebo (Risk Ratio [RR] = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.87–3.56; p < 0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 59%). The NNT to achieve one additional responder was 5 (95% CI: 4–7). Elobixibat significantly increased the mean number of SBMs per week (Mean Difference [MD] = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.19–2.11; p < 0.00001; I² = 64%). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal; elobixibat significantly increased the risk of diarrhea (RR = 4.21; 95% CI: 3.01–5.89; NNH = 6) and abdominal pain (RR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.63–3.38; NNH = 11). Most events were mild to moderate.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence that the IBAT inhibitor elobixibat is a highly effective therapy for refractory CC, offering a significant improvement in symptoms for a substantial portion of patients. This benefit must be carefully balanced against the high incidence of mechanism-based gastrointestinal side effects. These findings establish elobixibat as a potent, mechanistically distinct option, thereby informing its strategic placement on the therapeutic ladder for patients failed by conventional laxatives.
Authors
- Imam Suprianto1*
- Fania Rizkyani Sariza2
- 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya/Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia
- 2Resident in Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya/Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia
Corresponding author Imam Suprianto — Imamkgeh@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.











