A Hierarchy of Harm: A Meta-analysis of Infection, Thrombosis, and Mortality Risks Across Central Catheters, Arteriovenous Grafts, and Fistulas

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Gede Anggra Pramana General Practitioner, Bangli Medika Canti Hospital, Bangli, Indonesia
  • Anthony Wijaya Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Putu Chandra Wibawa Staff Vascular & Endovascular Surgery Division, Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Agung Bagus Krisna Wibawa Endovascular Division of Department Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i12.1462

Keywords:

Arteriovenous fistula, Arteriovenous graf, Central venous catheter, Hemodialysis, Vascular access

Abstract

Background: Vascular access is a critical lifeline for patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring hemodialysis. The optimal choice among central venous catheters (CVCs), arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) is a subject of intense debate, as each modality carries a distinct profile of risks. This meta-analysis was performed to establish a definitive, quantitative hierarchy of these risks to better inform clinical and policy decisions.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between January 2015 and September 2025 that compared complication rates among CVCs, AVGs, and AVFs in adult hemodialysis patients. Seven high-quality cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 18,542 patients. Data on access-related bloodstream infections (ARBSI), access circuit thrombosis/dysfunction, and all-cause mortality were extracted. Pairwise meta-analyses using a random-effects model calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Central venous catheters were associated with a profoundly higher risk of ARBSI compared to both AVFs (RR 8.12, 95% CI 6.98–9.45, p < 0.001) and AVGs (RR 4.55, 95% CI 3.89–5.33, p < 0.001). Arteriovenous grafts demonstrated a markedly higher risk of access circuit thrombosis compared to AVFs (RR 2.78, 95% CI 2.41–3.21, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was highest in patients with CVCs, showing a significantly increased risk compared to AVF users (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.68–2.19, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust, contemporary quantitative evidence for a clear hierarchy of harm in hemodialysis access. CVCs pose the greatest risk for infection and mortality, AVGs present the highest risk for thrombosis, and AVFs represent the safest option. These data provide a powerful rationale for reinforcing systemic healthcare initiatives aimed at minimizing CVC exposure and promoting timely AVF placement.

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Gede Anggra Pramana1*
  • Anthony Wijaya2
  • Putu Chandra Wibawa3
  • I Gusti Agung Bagus Krisna Wibawa4
  1. 1General Practitioner, Bangli Medika Canti Hospital, Bangli, Indonesia
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  3. 3Staff Vascular & Endovascular Surgery Division, Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia
  4. 4Endovascular Division of Department Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

Corresponding author Anak Agung Ngurah Gede Anggra Pramana — anggrapramana02@gmail.com

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

Article metrics

451Abstract views
274PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Anak Agung Ngurah Gede Anggra Pramana, Anthony Wijaya, Putu Chandra Wibawa, I Gusti Agung Bagus Krisna Wibawa. A Hierarchy of Harm: A Meta-analysis of Infection, Thrombosis, and Mortality Risks Across Central Catheters, Arteriovenous Grafts, and Fistulas. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 6 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];9(12):9848-63. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/1462

Most read articles by the same author(s)