The Effect of Apium graveolens (Linn) Extract on Reepithelialization of Incision Wounds: In Vivo Study

Authors

  • Muhammad Avicenna Abdul Syukur Specialized Residency Training of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia/Master Program of Biomedicine Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Endang Mahati Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Vega Karlowee Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Hermawan Istiadi Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Indah Saraswati Department of Medical Biology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Najatullah Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Muflihatul Muniroh Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v6i18.735

Keywords:

Apium graveolens, Epithelial thickness ratio, Epithelial length, Incision wound

Abstract

Background: A wound is a disorder of the continuity of the epithelial layer of the skin or mucosa and can result from physical or thermal damage. Proliferation and remodeling processes are important phases in incision wound healing. Celery is believed to have the potential to regulate the inflammatory phase and accelerate the process of proliferation and remodeling of wound tissue. This study aims to evaluate the potency of celery extract (Apium graveolens (Linn)) on incision wound healing in vivo.

Methods: This study was an in vivo experimental study. A total of 24 rats were used in this study and divided into 4 treatment groups (2 control and 2 treatment groups). Analysis of epithelial thickness ratio and epithelial length was performed using SPSS using univariate and bivariate.

Results: The control group had the lowest epithelial thickness ratio, followed by 50% extract, 75% extract, and finally, the gentamicin group. The length of newly formed epithelium in wounds treated with Apium graveolens (Linn) extract group 70% (mean 1.461 mm) was similar to that treated with gentamicin 0.1% (mean 1.457 mm) and much better than those treated without extract (0.869 mm).

Conclusion: Celery extract (Apium graveolens (Linn)) has the potential to accelerate the process of reepithelialization of incision wounds in vivo studies.

Authors

  • Muhammad Avicenna Abdul Syukur1
  • Endang Mahati2
  • Vega Karlowee3
  • Hermawan Istiadi3
  • Indah Saraswati4
  • Najatullah5
  • Muflihatul Muniroh6*
  1. 1Specialized Residency Training of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia/Master Program of Biomedicine Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. 2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. 3Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  4. 4Department of Medical Biology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  5. 5Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  6. 6Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Corresponding author Muflihatul Muniroh — muflihatul.muniroh@fk.undip.ac.id

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

Article metrics

828Abstract views
486PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Muhammad Avicenna Abdul Syukur, Endang Mahati, Vega Karlowee, Hermawan Istiadi, Indah Saraswati, Najatullah, et al. The Effect of Apium graveolens (Linn) Extract on Reepithelialization of Incision Wounds: In Vivo Study. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 31 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];6(18):2939-43. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/735

Most read articles by the same author(s)