Hydrostatic Pressure versus Passive Diffusion: A Split-Face Comparative Analysis of Intradermal Injection and Microneedling-Assisted Delivery of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Facial Pore Refinement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v10i3.1529Keywords:
Intradermal injection, Microbotox, Microneedling, Seborrhea, Split-face studyAbstract
Background: Enlarged facial pores, medically termed dilated pilosebaceous follicles, represent a prevalent aesthetic concern driven by seborrhea, follicular hypertrophy, and loss of perifollicular elasticity. Microbotox, the intradermal administration of dilute OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A), targets these mechanisms through sebosuppression and arrector pili inhibition. However, the optimal delivery vehicle—active intradermal injection versus passive microneedling-assisted transport—remains debated regarding clinical delivery efficiency.
Case presentation: A 23-year-old female with Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV, severe pore enlargement (Kim’s Score 5), and seborrhea participated in a split-face comparative study. The right cheek received standard intradermal microdroplet injections of BoNT-A (20 U diluted in 1.0 mL saline). The left cheek underwent automated microneedling at a depth of 2.0 mm immediately followed by topical application of the same BoNT-A solution. Evaluation was performed at baseline, Day 7, and Day 14 using blinded clinical scoring and digital dermoscopic analysis. At Day 14, the intradermal injection side demonstrated superior pore reduction (Kim’s Score 5 to 3) compared to the microneedling side (Score 5 to 4). Digital quantification confirmed a 45% reduction in mean pore diameter on the injected side versus 18% on the microneedling side. While both modalities effectively reduced sebum scores to 1, the microneedling side exhibited delayed pore refinement, likely attributed to post-traumatic edema and the wash-out effect of blood flow antagonizing passive diffusion.
Conclusion: Direct intradermal injection provides superior clinical delivery efficiency for BoNT-A, resulting in more rapid and significant pore contraction. Microneedling-assisted delivery, particularly at depths inducing vascular injury, acts as a secondary adjunct for textural remodeling but is inferior for immediate pharmacological delivery of large-molecule toxins.
Authors
- Jill N Pairunan1*
- Marlyn Grace Kapantow1
- Ferra Olivia Mawu1
- 1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia
Corresponding author Jill N Pairunan — jillpairunan@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As our aim is to disseminate original research article, hence the publishing right is a necessary one. The publishing right is needed in order to reach the agreement between the author and publisher. As the journal is fully open access, the authors will sign an exclusive license agreement.
The authors have the right to:
- Share their article in the same ways permitted to third parties under the relevant user license.
- Retain copyright, patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights including research data.
- Proper attribution and credit for the published work.
For the open access article, the publisher is granted to the following right.
- The non-exclusive right to publish the article and grant right to others.
- For the published article, the publisher applied for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
