Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation with 0.05% Chlorhexidine versus 0.9% Saline to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Laparotomy for Hollow-Viscus Perforation Peritonitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v10i7.1637Keywords:
Chlorhexidine, Gastrointestinal perforation, Laparotomy, Surgical site infection, Wound irrigationAbstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most frequent complication of abdominal surgery and a major source of morbidity, prolonged hospitalization and cost, particularly in dirty (class IV) wounds created by gastrointestinal perforation; intraoperative incisional irrigation may lower wound bioburden, yet the optimal irrigant is undefined.
Methods: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral center in Bandung, Indonesia (November 2019–August 2020) comparing incisional irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine versus 0.9% saline in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy for hollow-viscus perforation peritonitis. After fascial closure, incisions were irrigated by allocation and patients were followed for 30 days, with superficial SSI (ASEPSIS score) as the primary outcome.
Results: Of 141 patients screened, 96 were analyzed (49 chlorhexidine, 47 saline). Superficial SSI occurred in 5/49 (10.2%) chlorhexidine versus 14/47 (29.8%) saline patients (χ²=5.795, p=0.016; Fisher exact p=0.021; OR 0.268, 95% CI 0.088–0.818; relative risk 0.343; absolute risk reduction 19.6%; number-needed-to-treat 5.1). In multivariable logistic regression, chlorhexidine remained independently protective (adjusted OR 0.228, 95% CI 0.062–0.836, p=0.026), while intra-abdominal contamination (aOR 1.377 per 100 mL, p=0.008) and operative time (aOR 1.645 per 30 min, p=0.027) increased risk; the model discriminated well (AUC 0.835). No irrigation-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: Incisional irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine markedly reduced superficial SSI after laparotomy for perforation peritonitis and offers a low-cost strategy for dirty abdominal wounds.
Authors
- Oktova Ardianto1*
- Bambang Am Am Setya Sulthana1
- Rizki Diposarosa1
- 1Digestive Surgery Division, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Corresponding author Oktova Ardianto — oktovaardianto@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.
