Anesthetic Management of a Young Adult with Severe Rheumatic Mitral and Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Double Valve Replacement: A Case Report

Authors

  • Fauzul Nurul Azmi Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Pelinggo Jaya Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Vera Muharrami Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Arifin Achmad Regional General Hospital, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v10i8.1639

Keywords:

Aortic valve stenosis, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Heart valve prosthesis implantation, Mitral valve stenosis, Rheumatic heart disease

Abstract

Background. Rheumatic heart disease remains a leading cause of valvular pathology in young adults of low- and middle-income countries. The coexistence of severe mitral stenosis (MS) and severe aortic stenosis (AS) confronts the anesthesiologist with directly opposed hemodynamic imperatives and a markedly narrowed margin of safety, particularly during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Case presentation. A 41-year-old man presented with a 14-year history of exertional syncope, progressive dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe rheumatic MS (mitral valve area 0.8 cm²) and severe rheumatic AS (aortic valve area 0.8 cm², mean gradient 56 mmHg) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (67%), reduced right ventricular contractility (TAPSE 17 mm), and atrial fibrillation. He underwent double valve replacement under general anesthesia using an opioid-based, hemodynamically stable induction with full invasive monitoring. Separation from CPB was complicated by two episodes of ventricular tachycardia requiring synchronized cardioversion (30 J and 20 J) and was managed with a milrinone–dobutamine–norepinephrine strategy. The patient was transferred ventilated to intensive care on inotropic and antiarrhythmic support and stabilized.

Conclusion. Combined severe MS and AS demands an individualized plan reconciling contradictory goals: adequate preload and a controlled, unhurried heart rate for MS, against maintained afterload and coronary perfusion for AS. Meticulous invasive monitoring, a stable induction, anticipation of right ventricular dysfunction, and readiness for perioperative arrhythmia are decisive for a safe outcome.

Authors

  • Fauzul Nurul Azmi1*
  • Pelinggo Jaya1
  • Vera Muharrami2
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Arifin Achmad Regional General Hospital, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Corresponding author Fauzul Nurul Azmi — dr.fauzul@gmail.com

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Article metrics

100Abstract views
73PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Azmi FN, Jaya P, Muharrami V. Anesthetic Management of a Young Adult with Severe Rheumatic Mitral and Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Double Valve Replacement: A Case Report. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 18 [cited 2026 Aug. 6];10(8):2636-49. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/1639

Most read articles by the same author(s)