Global and Site-Specific Osteoarthritis Burden, 1990–2021, and Rehabilitation Capacity Modeling for Indonesia: A Spatiotemporal Analysis

Authors

  • Dina Wulandari Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Datu Sanggul Regional General Hospital, Tapin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v10i9.1654

Keywords:

Capacity modeling, Estimated annual percentage change, Global burden of disease, Osteoarthritis, Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is a major and growing cause of disability, but prevalence does not directly measure clinically assessed rehabilitation need, demand, utilization, or unmet need.

Objective: We quantified global, regional, national, and joint-site burden and linked rehabilitation-amenable prevalence to transparent capacity scenarios for Indonesia.

Methods: We integrated annual WHO/IHME rehabilitation-amenable osteoarthritis estimates for 195 countries (1990–2021), published GBD 2019 site-specific prevalence, published GBD 2021 incidence and years lived with disability, and WHO rehabilitation specifications. EAPC was calculated from annual posterior-mean age-standardized rates using log-linear regression; published joinpoint AAPC retained its original name. Deterministic scenarios converted Indonesia’s 2021 prevalence into direct-contact hours and multidisciplinary FTE-year equivalents.

Results: In 2021, 371.6 million people globally and 9.08 million in Indonesia had osteoarthritis-related functioning problems for which rehabilitation could be beneficial. From 1990 to 2021, prevalence increased by 137.7% globally and 199.8% in Indonesia. Prevalence EAPC was 0.34% annually globally and 0.55% in Indonesia. Knee osteoarthritis had the highest site-specific rate, whereas hand incidence and YLDs had the fastest published AAPCs in several middle-SDI settings. Indonesia’s foundational, scale-up, and comprehensive scenarios produced 5,673, 29,223, and 93,914 direct-contact FTE-year equivalents.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation-amenable osteoarthritis burden increased faster in Indonesia than globally and varied by joint site and development level. Scenario outputs are model-based decision quantities, not national staffing requirements or workforce gaps, and require stakeholder validation with local severity, capacity, delivery, referral, adherence, and workforce data.

Authors

  • Dina Wulandari1*
  1. 1Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Datu Sanggul Regional General Hospital, Tapin, Indonesia

Corresponding author Dina Wulandari — Dinaa.wulandari8888@gmail.com

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

Article metrics

33Abstract views
23PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Wulandari D. Global and Site-Specific Osteoarthritis Burden, 1990–2021, and Rehabilitation Capacity Modeling for Indonesia: A Spatiotemporal Analysis. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 6 [cited 2026 Aug. 21];10(9):2832-45. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/1654