Dietary Pattern and Psychological Stress Are Not Associated with Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Symptoms in Female Preclinical Medical Students: A Precision-Focused Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v10i9.1655Keywords:
Cross-sectional studies, Feeding behavior, Gastroesophageal reflux, Psychological stress, StudentsAbstract
Background: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is among the most prevalent chronic gastrointestinal disorders worldwide and its absolute burden continues to rise, yet studies of behavioural determinants in young adults report statistical significance without magnitude and almost never state the effect size their design could detect.
Objective: To estimate the association of dietary pattern and psychological stress with symptom-defined gastro-oesophageal reflux, and the precision with which those associations could be detected, in a restriction-based sample of female preclinical medical students.
Methods: This STROBE-compliant cross-sectional study used a restriction-based design to isolate behavioural exposures from adiposity and the other dominant reflux risk factors. Of 120 randomly selected female preclinical medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, 104 responded (86.7%) and 87 met eligibility criteria fixing female sex, body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, never-smoking, no alcohol intake and no gastro-active medication. Dietary pattern, stress and reflux symptoms were measured with validated Indonesian instruments and analysed with exact tests, Firth penalised logistic regression, Bayesian estimation, quantitative bias analysis and formal precision analysis.
Results: GERD-Q positivity was 12.6% (95% CI 7.2-21.2); 8.0% had a poor dietary pattern and 43.7% reported stress. Adjusted odds ratios were 3.35 (95% CI 0.55-16.12; p = 0.208) for poor dietary pattern and 1.10 (95% CI 0.31-3.78; p = 0.339) for stress; Bayes factors favouring the null ranged from 0.99 to 2.05 and from 1.78 to 4.90 across four priors. Minimum detectable odds ratios were 12.23 and 4.32. Correcting for outcome misclassification raised the dietary odds ratio to 6.61.
Conclusion: Neither exposure was associated with reflux symptoms; the study excludes only large effects, and about 459 participants would be needed to detect the observed dietary effect.
Authors
- Najwa Faradila Yuvitri1
- Sri Wahyuningsih1*
- Wilfadri Putra Jonesti1
- Aulia Chairani1
- 1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding author Sri Wahyuningsih — sriwahyuningsih@upnvj.ac.id
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Najwa Faradila Yuvitri, Sri Wahyuningsih, Wilfadri Putra Jonesti, Aulia Chairani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.
