Optic Neuritis After Viral Vector versus mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i10.1412Keywords:
COVID-19 vaccines, Meta-analysis, mRNA Vaccine, Optic neuritis, Viral vector vaccineAbstract
Background: The global deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, utilizing distinct viral vector and mRNA technologies, has been followed by reports of rare neuro-ophthalmic adverse events, including optic neuritis (ON). This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical phenotypes, autoimmune serological profiles, and visual outcomes of ON cases with onset in temporal association with viral vector versus mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases for case reports and case series published up to August 2025 detailing ON after COVID-19 vaccination. Data were extracted on clinical presentation, MRI findings, serostatus for aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) antibodies, treatments, and visual outcomes. Separate meta-analyses of proportions and comparative odds ratios (OR) were calculated for key outcomes, including distinct analyses for NMOSD and MOGAD.
Results: Our analysis of published reports included 20 studies, comprising 90 patients (40 viral vector, 50 mRNA). Cases associated with viral vector vaccines had significantly higher odds of presenting with bilateral disease (OR 4.31, 95% CI [1.67, 11.11]). This platform was also associated with markedly increased odds of AQP4-IgG positivity (NMOSD) (OR 5.15, 95% CI [1.35, 19.61]) and MOG-IgG positivity (MOGAD) (OR 4.58, 95% CI [1.09, 19.21]). Consequently, these patients had higher odds of requiring aggressive immunotherapy and of suffering incomplete visual recovery (OR 3.41, 95% CI [1.14, 10.21]).
Conclusion: Our analysis of published case reports suggests that while ON following COVID-19 vaccination is a very rare event, its clinical phenotype may differ based on the vaccine platform. Cases associated with viral vector vaccines appear more likely to manifest as a severe, bilateral, antibody-mediated condition characteristic of NMOSD or MOGAD. These findings, which do not establish causality, underscore the critical importance of prompt autoantibody testing to guide appropriate management. The established benefits of vaccination continue to overwhelmingly outweigh the exceptionally low absolute risk of such adverse events.
Authors
- Tiara Alexander1*
- I Made Ady Wirawan2
- I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari1
- Ida Ayu Ary Pramita1
- 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana/Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia
- 2Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
Corresponding author Tiara Alexander — tiaraalexander89@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.
