The Gut-Muscle Axis in Sarcopenia: A Meta-Analysis of Gut Microbiome Compositional Features and Their Correlation with Muscle Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Older Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i9.1384Keywords:
Dysbiosis, Gut microbiome, Gut-muscle axis, Older adults, SarcopeniaAbstract
Background: Sarcopenia, the age-related decline in muscle mass and function, is a major geriatric syndrome. The gut-muscle axis has emerged as a key area of investigation, yet the association between gut microbiome composition and sarcopenic parameters in humans remains quantified by a collection of studies with varied methodologies. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the existing correlational evidence linking gut microbiome features to the core components of sarcopenia in older adults.
Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for observational studies published between January 2015 and July 2025 that assessed gut microbiome composition and sarcopenia metrics in adults aged ≥60. Correlation coefficients (r) were pooled using a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity using the I² statistic, conducted pre-specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and evaluated study quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Results: Six cross-sectional studies (N=1,189) met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was high (median NOS score = 8). The pooled analysis revealed a significant, small positive correlation between gut microbial alpha diversity and muscle strength (handgrip strength) (pooled r = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.27; I² = 41%). The relative abundance of the genus Faecalibacterium, known for its potential to produce butyrate, was significantly correlated with physical performance (pooled r = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.16-0.32; I² = 28%). A non-significant negative correlation was found between the family Enterobacteriaceae and muscle mass (pooled r = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.29-0.01; I² = 62%). Subgroup analysis suggested this heterogeneity was partly explained by the diagnostic criteria used for sarcopenia.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence of a modest but significant association between gut microbiome composition and muscle health in older adults. A microbial profile with higher diversity and greater abundance of putative beneficial taxa is correlated with better muscle function. These associative findings, while limited by the cross-sectional nature of the data and the potential for reverse causality, reinforce the clinical relevance of the gut-muscle axis and underscore the need for longitudinal, multi-omic studies to elucidate mechanisms and test microbiome-targeted therapies.
Authors
- Vyora Ulvyana1*
- Roza Mulyana2
- Rose Dinda Martini2
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas/Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia
- 2Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Universitas Andalas/Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia
Corresponding author Vyora Ulvyana — vyora.ulvyana@gmail.com
Article history
- Submitted
- Accepted
- Published
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and licensing
Copyright in each article remains with the author(s). Authors grant Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research a non-exclusive right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher. No exclusive transfer of copyright is required.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Users may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate attribution is given, a link to the license is supplied, changes are indicated, and adaptations are distributed under the same license.
The license applies to the article's scholarly content unless a credit line states otherwise. Third-party material may be subject to separate rights. Authors retain patent, trademark, moral, and research-data rights. The copyright year follows the article's publication date.











