Diagnostic Performance of Imaging Modalities in Persistent or Recurrent Hyperparathyroidism: A Network Meta-Analysis of 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT, 4D-CT, and Scintigraphy

Authors

  • Hendry Johan Renaldy Tandra Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Theranostics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Endah Indriani Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Theranostics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Hendra Budiawan Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Theranostics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Basuki Hidayat Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Theranostics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i11.1424

Keywords:

18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, Network meta-analysis, Parathyroid scintigraphy, Persistent hyperparathyroidism, Recurrent hyperparathyroidism

Abstract

Background: The surgical management of persistent or recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is critically dependent on accurate preoperative localization of ectopic or residual hyperfunctioning glands within a scarred anatomical field. While 18F-Fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FCH PET/CT), four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT), and 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy are employed, a definitive evidence-based hierarchy to guide their use is absent. This study aimed to establish this hierarchy by comparing their diagnostic performance through a network meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted for comparative studies published between January 2015 and August 2025 evaluating these modalities in persistent/recurrent PHPT. A Bayesian bivariate network meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivities and specificities on both a per-patient and per-lesion basis. Modalities were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) scores. Methodological quality, inconsistency, and heterogeneity were formally assessed.

Results: Seven studies involving 687 patients were included. On a per-patient analysis, 18F-FCH PET/CT demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 94.1% (95% Credible Interval [CrI]: 89.8%–97.5%), significantly outperforming 4D-CT (82.5%; 95% CrI: 75.1%–88.9%) and scintigraphy with SPECT/CT (60.3%; 95% CrI: 51.2%–69.1%). Specificities were uniformly high. Per-lesion analysis confirmed this hierarchy. SUCRA rankings identified 18F-FCH PET/CT as the superior modality for both per-patient (98.7%) and per-lesion (99.1%) detection. No significant network inconsistency was detected.

Conclusion: 18F-FCH PET/CT exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy for localizing culprit parathyroid glands in persistent or recurrent PHPT. Its performance, grounded in robust metabolic targeting that overcomes the challenges of a reoperative field, supports its positioning as the primary imaging modality in this setting. These findings advocate for a revision of current diagnostic algorithms to enhance surgical planning and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

  • Hendry Johan Renaldy Tandra1*
  • Endah Indriani1
  • Hendra Budiawan1
  • Basuki Hidayat1
  1. 1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Theranostics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia

Corresponding author Hendry Johan Renaldy Tandra — hendrytandra08@gmail.com

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2025-08-21

Article metrics

441Abstract views
370PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Hendry Johan Renaldy Tandra, Endah Indriani, Hendra Budiawan, Basuki Hidayat. Diagnostic Performance of Imaging Modalities in Persistent or Recurrent Hyperparathyroidism: A Network Meta-Analysis of 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT, 4D-CT, and Scintigraphy. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 21 [cited 2026 Aug. 14];9(11):9318-34. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/1424

Most read articles by the same author(s)