Ultrasound vs Nerve Conduction Studies: A Comparative Analysis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis

Authors

  • Hasnawi Haddani Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Henry Sugiharto Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Afriani Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Theresia Christin Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Legiran Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Ferawaty Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v8i12.1145

Keywords:

Accuracy, Carpal tunnel syndrome, Diagnosis, Nerve conduction studies, Ultrasound

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent entrapment neuropathy. While nerve conduction studies (NCS) remain the gold standard for diagnosis, ultrasound (USG) offers a non-invasive alternative. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of USG and NCS in CTS at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang, Indonesia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients presenting with CTS symptoms. Demographic and clinical data were collected. NCS and USG assessments were performed, blinded to each other's results. USG measurements included the cross-sectional area at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSAc), proximal to the carpal tunnel (CSAp), and the difference between them (∆CSA). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated, and agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa.

Results: A total of 86 wrists from 49 patients were included. The mean age was 52 ± 11 years, with a female predominance (86%). The majority had mild CTS based on NCS (55.8%). USG measurements showed mean CSAc of 13.1 ± 3.5 mm², CSAp of 10.6 ± 3.0 mm², and ∆CSA of 2.5 ± 0.9 mm². ∆CSA had the highest sensitivity (92.2%), specificity (88.9%), and accuracy (91.9%), with substantial agreement with NCS (Kappa = 0.65).

Conclusion: USG, particularly using ∆CSA, demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in CTS, comparable to NCS. It can serve as a valuable tool, especially in settings with limited NCS availability.

Authors

  • Hasnawi Haddani1
  • Henry Sugiharto1
  • Afriani1
  • Theresia Christin1
  • Legiran2
  • Ferawaty1*
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

Corresponding author Ferawaty — ferawaty05@yahoo.com

Article history

  1. Submitted
  2. Accepted
  3. Published

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

Article metrics

1,073Abstract views
1,099PDF downloads

How to Cite

1.
Hasnawi Haddani, Henry Sugiharto, Afriani, Theresia Christin, Legiran, Ferawaty. Ultrasound vs Nerve Conduction Studies: A Comparative Analysis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis. Bioscmed [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];8(12):5685-96. Available from: https://bioscmed.com/index.php/bsm/article/view/1145

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2